User:Alemagno12/Translation maps for SSS: Difference between revisions
User:Alemagno12/Translation maps for SSS (edit)
Revision as of 05:41, 13 November 2023
, 7 months agono edit summary
Alemagno12 (talk | contribs) m (Formatting) |
Alemagno12 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1:
Here are some
TODO: Prove that lexicographic ordering is equivalent to expansion for SSS. This is already proven for BM2.3 in <nowiki>[Yto2023]</nowiki>
== Up to \(\varepsilon_0\) ==
<b>Lemma 1.</b> Assume that o<sub>SSS</sub>(X) = o<sub>BM2.3</sub>(X') and o<sub>SSS</sub>(Y) = o<sub>BM2.3</sub>(Y') for some standard X,X',Y,Y'. Then, o<sub>SSS</sub>(X+(0)+Y) = o<sub>BM2.3</sub>(X'+Y').
<i>Proof.</i> By induction on Y. Zero and successor cases are trivial. For the limit case, let Z < Y and o<sub>SSS</sub>(Z) = o<sub>BM2.3</sub>(Z').
* BM2.3 does not have any "stop at the leftmost element if you can't find the bad root" condition, so the bad root of X'+Z' is the bad root of Z', and o<sub>BM2.3</sub>(X'+Z') = sup<sub>n<ω</sub>(o<sub>BM2.3</sub>(X'+exp(Z',n))).
* For SSS, if the second bad root check finds a bad root in Z, the bad root of X+(0)+Z is the bad root of Z. If it does not find a bad root, then since the first bad root must be at least (0,1) and every standard expression starts with 0, (0)+Z = (0,0)+W for some W < (0,1) <= bad root;
WIP
|