Talk:List of functions: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Augigogigi in topic CNF
Content added Content deleted
Augigogigi (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Augigogigi (talk | contribs) (→CNF: Reply) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The Cantor normal form isn't an ordinal function. It's rather a representation that can be assigned to any ordinal. I guess you could consider it as a function from ordinals to finite lists of coefficient/exponent pairs, or any other Cantor normal form representation. – [[User:OfficialURL|<span style="background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(left,#cd0000,#686800,#007600,#007171,#4646ff,#b400b4,#cd0000);color:white;"><b>OfficialURL</b></span>]] ([[User_talk:OfficialURL|talk]]) 05:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC) |
The Cantor normal form isn't an ordinal function. It's rather a representation that can be assigned to any ordinal. I guess you could consider it as a function from ordinals to finite lists of coefficient/exponent pairs, or any other Cantor normal form representation. – [[User:OfficialURL|<span style="background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(left,#cd0000,#686800,#007600,#007171,#4646ff,#b400b4,#cd0000);color:white;"><b>OfficialURL</b></span>]] ([[User_talk:OfficialURL|talk]]) 05:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC) |
||
:this should also include notations, but [List of functions and notations] is wordy → [[User:Augigogigi|<span style="color:#008080;">Augi</span>]] 18:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 18:32, 6 September 2022
CNF[edit source]
The Cantor normal form isn't an ordinal function. It's rather a representation that can be assigned to any ordinal. I guess you could consider it as a function from ordinals to finite lists of coefficient/exponent pairs, or any other Cantor normal form representation. – OfficialURL (talk) 05:37, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- this should also include notations, but [List of functions and notations] is wordy → Augi 18:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)