Sharp: Difference between revisions

16 bytes added ,  10 months ago
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3:
Sharps are important in inner model theory because the nonexistence of certain sharps shows that the inner models constructed possess significant fine structure and satisfy covering, as well as other properties which a "core model" should have.
 
One can also define \(x^\sharp\) when \(x\) isn't a real number. Although the precise definition varies, \(x^\sharp\) is often defined as a sharp for \(L[x]\), the smallest inner model which is amenable for \(x\), or as \(L(x)\), the smallest inner model containing \(x\). When \(x\) is a set of ordinals, the ambiguity disappears. Sharps beyond \(x^\sharp\) include \(0^\dagger\), \(0^\{sword}\) and \(0^\Ptext{¶}\). \(0^\dagger\) is a sharp for \(L[U]\), where \(U\) is an ultrafilter witnessing some cardinal's [[Measurable|measurability]]. This is a significantly stronger object than \(x^\sharp\) for sets \(x\), because a measurable cardinal has much more consistency strength than an inaccessible cardinal \(\delta\) such that \(x^\sharp\) exists for all \(x \in H_\delta\), which itself has more consistency strength than the existence of \(r^\sharp\) for all reals \(r\). \(0^\{sword}\) is a sharp for an inner model \(N\) accommodating a measurable cardinal with nontrivial [[Mitchell rank]], i.e. so that \((V^\kappa / U)^N\) satisfies "\(\kappa\) is measurable". Lastly, \(0^\Ptext{¶}\) is an inner model for a [[Strong cardinal|strong]] cardinal.