List of ordinals: Difference between revisions

From Apeirology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(44 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Apeirology primarily studies the structure of ordinals. This study can be crudely split into three parts: the [[Recursive ordinal|recursive ordinals]] have an explicit (recursive) wellordering describing them; the nonrecursive, countable ordinals, where phenomena such as admissibility and reflection starts to arise; and the uncountable cardinals, particularly large cardinals, where many similarities to the [[natural numbers]] disappear and the primary objects being studied include elementary embeddings, [[cofinality]], [[Cardinal|cardinality]] and abstract reflection or partition properties.

As such, apeirology is linked to:

* [[Set theory]] (which includes study of large cardinals)
* [[A-recursion theory|α-recursion theory]] (the study of generalising recursion on the natural numbers to on L_α for [[admissible]] ordinals α)
* [[B-recursion theory|β-recursion theory]] (the generalisation of α-recursion theory to non-admissible α)
* [[Proof theory]] and [[ordinal analysis]] (which assigns recursive ordinals to theories according to the lengths of the recursive well-orders they can prove well-founded)
* Googology (which translates recursive ordinal notations into systems for constructing large finite numbers).

Below we list some milestone ordinals.

== Countable ordinals ==
== Countable ordinals ==
In this list we assume there is a transitive model of ZFC.<!--Necessary to compare ordinals such as "least a such that L_a models ZFC"-->
In this list we assume there is a transitive model of ZFC.<!--Necessary to compare ordinals such as "least a such that L_a models ZFC"--> The \(\psi\) is Extended Buchholz unless specified.
* [[0]], the smallest ordinal
* [[0]], the smallest ordinal
* [[1]], the first successor ordinal
* [[1]], the first successor ordinal
* [[omega|\( \omega \)]], the first limit ordinal
* [[omega|\( \omega \)]], the first limit ordinal
* [[omega^2|\( \omega^{2} \)]]
* [[omega^2|\( \omega^{2} \)]], the second infinite additive principal ordinal
* [[omega^3|\( \omega^{3} \)]]
* \( \omega^{3} \)
*<!--w^3 is not significant enough to have its own page, other than being the PTO of EFA and ID0 + Exp.-->
* [[omega^omega|\( \omega^{\omega} \)]]
* [[omega^omega|\( \omega^{\omega} \)]]
* [[epsilon_numbers#zero|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega) = \varphi(1,0) = \varepsilon_{0} \)]]<sup>(sort out page)</sup>
* [[epsilon_numbers#zero|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega) = \varphi(1,0) = \varepsilon_{0} \)]], the PTO of PA and ACA<sub>0</sub><sup>(sort out page)</sup>
* [[veblen_hierarchy#zeta|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{2}) = \varphi(2,0) = \zeta_{0} \)]]<sup>(decide if own page)</sup>
* [[veblen_hierarchy#zeta|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{2}) = \varphi(2,0) = \zeta_{0} \)]]<sup>(decide if own page)</sup>
* [[veblen_hierarchy|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{\omega}) = \varphi(\omega,0) \)]]
* [[veblen_hierarchy|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{\omega}) = \varphi(\omega,0) \)]], the second infinite primitive recursively principal ordinal
* [[feferman-schutte_ordinal|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{\Omega}) = \varphi(1,0,0) = \Gamma_{0} \)]], the Feferman-Schutte ordinal and the PTO of ATR<sub>0</sub>
* [[feferman-schutte_ordinal|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{\Omega}) = \varphi(1,0,0) = \Gamma_{0} \)]], the Feferman-Schutte ordinal and the PTO of ATR<sub>0</sub>. This is the least \(\alpha\) such that \(L_\alpha\cap\mathcal P(\omega)\) satisfies Feferman's theory \(\mathrm{IR}\).<ref>S. G. Simpson, "[https://sgslogic.net/t20/talks/feferfest/paper3.pdf Predicativity: The Outer Limits]" (2000), p.3. Accessed 30 January 2024.</ref>
* [[the_veblen_hierarchy#ackermann|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{\Omega^{2}}) = \varphi(1,0,0,0) \)]], the Ackermann Ordinal<sup>(decide if keep)</sup>
* [[the_veblen_hierarchy#ackermann|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{\Omega^{2}}) = \varphi(1,0,0,0) \)]], the Ackermann Ordinal<sup>(decide if keep)</sup>
* [[small_veblen_ordinal|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{\Omega^{\omega}}) = \varphi\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ \omega\end{pmatrix} \)]], the SVO (Small Veblen ordinal)
* [[small_veblen_ordinal|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{\Omega^{\omega}}) = \varphi\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ \omega\end{pmatrix} \)]], the SVO (Small Veblen ordinal)
* [[large_veblen_ordinal|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{\Omega^{\Omega}}) \)]], the LVO (Large Veblen ordinal)
* [[large_veblen_ordinal|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{\Omega^{\Omega}}) \)]], the LVO (Large Veblen ordinal)
* [[bachmann_howard_ordinal|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega_{2}) \)]], the BHO (Bachmann-Howard ordinal)
* [[bachmann_howard_ordinal|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega_{2}) \)]], the BHO (Bachmann-Howard ordinal)
* [[buchholz_ordinal|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega_{\omega}) \)]], the BO (Buchholz ordinal)
* [[buchholz_ordinal|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega_{\omega}) \)]], the BO (Buchholz ordinal) and the PTO of \( \Pi^1_1 \)-comprehension
* [[takeuti-feferman-buchholz_ordinal|\( \psi_{0}(\varepsilon_{\Omega_{\omega} + 1}) \)]], the TFB (Takeuti-Feferman-Buchholz ordinal)
* [[takeuti-feferman-buchholz_ordinal|\( \psi_{0}(\varepsilon_{\Omega_{\omega} + 1}) \)]], the TFBO (Takeuti-Feferman-Buchholz ordinal) and the PTO of \( \Pi^1_1 \)-comprehension with bar induction
* [[extened_buchholz_ordinal|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega_{\Omega_{\dots}}) \)]], the EBO (Extended Buchholz ordinal)
* [[Bird's ordinal|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega_\Omega) \)]], sometimes known as Bird's ordinal
* [[extended_buchholz_ordinal|\( \psi_{0}(\Omega_{\Omega_{\dots}}) \)]], the EBO (Extended Buchholz ordinal) and the PTO of \( \Pi^1_1 \)-transfinite recursion
* \( \psi_{\Omega}(\varepsilon_{I+1}) \), the PTO of KPi
* \( \psi_{\Omega}(\varepsilon_{\chi_1(0)+1}) \), the PTO of KPi or \( \Delta^1_2 \)-comprehension with transfinite induction (in Rathjen's Mahlo OCF, also applies to the one below)
* \( \psi_{\Omega}(\psi_{\chi_{\varepsilon_{M+1}}(0)}(0)) \), the PTO of KPM
* \( \psi_{\Omega}(\psi_{\chi_{\varepsilon_{M+1}}(0)}(0)) \), the PTO of KPM
* \( \Psi^{0}_{\Omega}(\varepsilon_{K+1}) \), the PTO of KP+\(\Pi_{3}\)-refl.
* \( \Psi^{0}_{\Omega}(\varepsilon_{K+1}) \), the PTO of KP+\(\Pi_{3}\)-refl. (in Rathjen's weakly compact OCF)
* \( \psi_\Omega(\varepsilon_{\mathbb{K}+1}) \), the PTO of KP with a \( \Pi_{\mathbb{N}}\)-refl. universe under ZF + V = L
* \( \psi_\Omega(\varepsilon_{\mathbb{K}+1}) \), the PTO of KP with a \( \Pi_{\mathbb{N}}\)-refl. universe under ZF + V = L
* \( \Psi_{\mathbb{X}}^{\varepsilon_{\Upsilon+1}} \), the limit of Jan-Carl Stegert's second [[ordinal_collapsing_function|OCF]] using indescribable cardinals
* <nowiki>\( \Psi_{\mathbb{X}}^{\varepsilon_{\Upsilon+1}} \) where \( \mathbb{X} = (\omega^+; \textsf{P}_0; \epsilon; \epsilon; 0) \), the limit of Jan-Carl Stegert's second </nowiki>[[ordinal_collapsing_function|OCF]] using indescribable cardinals
* PTO of \( \text{Z}_{2} \)
* PTO of \( \Pi^1_2 \)-comprehension
* PTO of \( \text{Z}_{2} \) = PTO of \(\mathrm{ZFC}\) minus powerset
* PTO of \( \text{KP} + "\omega_1 \) exists \( " \)
* PTO of \( \text{ZFC} \)
* PTO of \( \text{ZFC} \)
* [[church_kleene_ordinal|\( \omega^{\text{CK}}_{1} \)]]
* [[church_kleene_ordinal|\( \omega^{\text{CK}}_{1} \)]], the Church-Kleene ordinal, i.e. the least ordinal which is not recursive and the second admissible ordinal
* \( \omega^{\text{CK}}_{\omega} \), the least limit of admissible ordinals = the least \(\alpha\) such that \(L_\alpha\cap\mathcal P(\omega)\) models \( \Pi^1_1 \)-comprehension = \(\Sigma^1_2\)-soundness ordinal of \(\Pi^1_1\mathrm{-CA}_0\)<ref name="Pi12Consequences">J. P. Aguilera, F. Pakhomov, "[https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.11652v1 The Π<sup>1</sup><sub>2</sub> Consequences of a Theory]" (2021). Accessed 18 January 2024.</ref><sup>p.24</sup>
* RECURSIVE ORDINALS GO HERE<sup>(sort out)</sup>
* The least recursively inaccessible ordinal<ref name=":0">D. Madore, [http://www.madore.org/~david/math/ordinal-zoo.pdf A Zoo of Ordinals] (2017). Accessed 7 September 2022.</ref><sup>(p.3)</sup>
* The least recursively inaccessible ordinal = the least \(\alpha\) such that \(L_\alpha\) models \( \textsf{KPi} \) or \(L_\alpha\cap\mathcal P(\omega)\) models \( \Delta^1_2 \)-comprehension<ref name=":0">D. Madore, [http://www.madore.org/~david/math/ordinal-zoo.pdf A Zoo of Ordinals] (2017). Accessed 7 September 2022.</ref><sup>(p.3)</sup>
* The least recursively Mahlo ordinal<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.3)</sup>
* The least recursively Mahlo ordinal = the least doubly \( \Pi_2 \)-reflecting ordinal = the least \(\alpha\) such that \(L_\alpha\) models \( \textsf{KPM} \)<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.3)</sup>
* The least recursively hyper-Mahlo ordinal<ref name=":1">W. Richter, P. Aczel, [https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/44063<nowiki> Inductive Definitions and Reflecting Properties of Admissible Ordinals] (1973, preprint, Universitetet i Oslo). Accessed 7 September 2022.</nowiki></ref><sup>(p.13)</sup>
* The least recursively hyper-Mahlo ordinal<ref name=":1">W. Richter, P. Aczel, [https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/44063<nowiki> Inductive Definitions and Reflecting Properties of Admissible Ordinals] (1973, preprint, Universitetet i Oslo). Accessed 7 September 2022.</nowiki></ref><sup>(p.13)</sup>
* The least \( \Pi_n \)-reflecting ordinals, for \( 2<n<\omega \)<ref name=":1" />
* The least \( \Pi_n \)-reflecting ordinals, for \( 2<n<\omega \)<ref name=":1" />
* The least \( (+1) \)-stable ordinal<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.4)</sup>
* The least \( (+1) \)-stable ordinal<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.4)</sup>
* The least \( (^+) \)-stable ordinal = least \( \Pi^1_1 \)-reflecting ordinal<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.4)</sup>
* The least \( (+\alpha) \)-stable ordinal, for small \(\alpha\)
* The least \( (\cdot 2) \)-stable ordinal
* The least \( (^+) \)-stable ordinal = the least \( \Pi^1_1 \)-reflecting ordinal<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.4)</sup>
* The least ordinal that is \( \Pi^1_1 \)-reflecting on the \( \Pi^1_1 \)-reflecting ordinals<ref name="OrderOfReflection">J. P. Aguilera, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.11769.pdf The Order of Reflection] (2019, arxiv preprint). Accessed 7 September 2022.</ref><!--An important ordinal to consider according to Taranovsky-->
* The least ordinal that is \( \Pi^1_1 \)-reflecting on the \( \Pi^1_1 \)-reflecting ordinals<ref name="OrderOfReflection">J. P. Aguilera, [https://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.11769.pdf The Order of Reflection] (2019, arxiv preprint). Accessed 7 September 2022.</ref><!--An important ordinal to consider according to Taranovsky-->
* The least \( \Sigma^1_1 \)-reflecting ordinal = least non-Gandy ordinal<ref name="OrderOfReflection" /><sup>(pp.3,9)</sup><ref name=":0" />
* The least \( \Sigma^1_1 \)-reflecting ordinal = the least non-Gandy ordinal<ref name="OrderOfReflection" /><sup>(pp.3,9)</sup><ref name=":0" />
* The \( (\sigma^1_1)^n \)-reflecting ordinals for \( 1<n<\omega \)<!--iterated \( \Sigma^1_1 \)-reflection--><ref name="OrderOfReflection" /><sup>(p.20)</sup>
* The \( (\sigma^1_1)^n \)-reflecting ordinals for \( 1<n<\omega \)<!--iterated \( \Sigma^1_1 \)-reflection--><ref name="OrderOfReflection" /><sup>(p.20)</sup>
* The least \( (^++1) \)-stable ordinal<sup>(Is this strictly greater than previous entry?)</sup><ref name="OrderOfReflection" /><sup>(p.20)</sup>
* The least \( (^++1) \)-stable ordinal<ref name="OrderOfReflection" /><sup>Each class of \((\sigma^1_1)^n\)-rfl. ordinals is nonempty below this ordinal (p.20)</sup>
* The least (next recursively inaccessible ordinal)-stable ordinal
* The least (next recursively Mahlo ordinal)-stable ordinal
* The least (next \( \Pi_n \)-reflecting ordinal)-stable ordinal, for \( 2<n<\omega \)
* The least doubly \( (+1) \)-stable ordinal<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.4)</sup>
* The least doubly \( (+1) \)-stable ordinal<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.4)</sup>
* The least \(\omega\)-ply stable ordinal = the least ordinal stable up to a nonprojectible ordinal = \(\Sigma^1_2\)-soundness ordinal of \(\Pi^1_2\mathrm{-CA}_0\)<ref name="Pi12Consequences" /><sup>p.24</sup>
* The least nonprojectible ordinal<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.5)</sup> = least ordinal \( \Pi_2 \)-reflecting on class of stable ordinals below<ref name=":2">E. Kranakis, [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003484382900225<nowiki> Reflection and Partition Properties of Admissible Ordinals] (1980). Accessed 7 September 2022.</nowiki></ref><sup>(p.218)</sup>
* The least \( \Sigma_2 \)-admissible ordinal<ref name=":0" /><sup>(pp.5-6)</sup> = least ordinal \( \Pi_3 \)-reflecting on class of stable ordinals below<ref name=":2" /><sup>(p.221)</sup>
* The least nonprojectible ordinal<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.5)</sup> = the least ordinal \( \Pi_2 \)-reflecting on the ordinals stable up to it = the least limit of \(\omega\)-ply stable ordinals<ref name=":2">E. Kranakis, [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003484382900225<nowiki> Reflection and Partition Properties of Admissible Ordinals] (1980). Accessed 7 September 2022.</nowiki></ref><sup>(p.218)</sup>
* The least \( \Sigma_2 \)-admissible ordinal<ref name=":0" /><sup>(pp.5-6)</sup> = least ordinal \( \Pi_3 \)-reflecting on the ordinals stable up to it<ref name=":2" /><sup>(p.221)</sup>
* HIGHER STABILITY STUFF GOES HERE<sup>(sort out)</sup>
* HIGHER STABILITY STUFF GOES HERE<sup>(sort out)</sup>
* Some Welch stuff here
* Some Welch stuff here
* [[Infinite_time_Turing_machine|Infinite time Turing machine]] ordinals
* [[Infinite_time_Turing_machine|Infinite time Turing machine]] ordinals
** \( \lambda \), the supremum of all writable ordinals
** \( \lambda \), the supremum of all writable ordinals = the least ordinal stable up to \( \zeta \) ordinal
** \( \gamma \), the supremum of all clockable ordinals
** \( \gamma \), the supremum of all clockable ordinals, equal to \( \lambda \)
** \( \zeta \), the supremum of all eventually writable ordinals
** \( \zeta \), the supremum of all eventually writable ordinals = the least \( \Sigma_2 \)-extendible ordinal
** \( \Sigma \), the supremum of all accidentally writable ordinals
** \( \Sigma \), the supremum of all accidentally writable ordinals = the least target of \( \Sigma_2 \)-stability
* The least ordinal in \(E_1\),<ref name="Welch2010Draft">P. D. Welch, [https://web.archive.org/web/20130108001818/https://maths.bris.ac.uk/~mapdw/det17.pdf Weak Systems of Determinacy and Arithmetical Quasi-Inductive Definitions] (April 2010 draft). Accessed 11 January 2023.</ref> in unpublished work Welch has shown this is an ordinal referred to as \(\zeta^{\varnothing^{\blacktriangledown}}\)<ref>R. S. Lubarsky, "ITTMs with Feedback", in ''[http://wwwmath.uni-muenster.de/logik/Personen/rds/festschrift.pdf Ways of Proof Theory]'', edited by R. Schindler, Ontos Series in Mathematical Logic (2010, p.338).</ref>
* The smallest [[gap_ordinals|gap ordinal]]<ref name="Gaps">W. Marek, M. Srebrny, [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003484374900059 Gaps in the Constructible Universe] (1973). Accessed 7 September 2022.</ref>
* The least ordinal in \(E_\eta\), for \(\eta > 1\)<ref name="Welch2010Draft" />
* The least admissible \(\alpha\) so that \(L_\alpha\) satisfies \(\mathsf{AQI}\), arithmetical quasi-induction = the least admissible \(\alpha\) so that, for all \(x \in \mathcal{P}(\omega) \cap L_\alpha\), there are \(\xi, \sigma < \alpha\) so that \(L_\xi[x] \prec_{\Sigma_2} L_\sigma[x]\)<ref name="Welch2010Draft" />{{verification failed}}
* Least \(\beta\) where \(L_\beta\) starts a chain of \(\Sigma_3\)-elementary substructures <ref name="Welch2010Draft" />
* The smallest [[gap ordinal]]<ref name="Gaps">W. Marek, M. Srebrny, [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003484374900059 Gaps in the Constructible Universe] (1973). Accessed 7 September 2022.</ref> = the least simultaneously \(\Sigma_n\)-nonprojectible ordinal for all \(n<\omega\)<ref>The Higher Infinite in Proof Theory, Michael Rathjen</ref>
*<!-- I'd like to put "least a so that some ordinal is undefinable in L_a", which is the same as the "least a so that L_b < L_a for some b < a", which is obviously bigger than the least gap ordinal. I don't know exactly where it lies, though. -->
* Least start of a gap in the constructible universe of length 2<ref name="Gaps" />
* Least start of a gap in the constructible universe of length 2<ref name="Gaps" />
* Least \( \beta \) that starts a gap of length \( \beta \)<ref name="Gaps" />
* Least \( \beta \) that starts a gap of length \( \beta \)<ref name="Gaps" />
* Least \( \beta \) that starts gap of length \( \beta^\beta \)<ref name="Gaps" />
* Least \( \beta \) that starts gap of length \( \beta^\beta \)<ref name="Gaps" />
* Least \( \beta \) that starts gap of length \( \beta^+ \) = least height of model of KP+"\( \omega_1 \) exists".<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.6)</sup> <ref>T. Arai, [https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.0596 A Sneak Preview of Proof Theory of Ordinals] (1997, preprint, p.17). Accessed 7 September 2022.</ref>
* Least \( \beta \) that starts gap of length \( \beta^+ \) - \(L_{\beta^+}\) here is a model of KP+"\( \omega_1 \) exists".<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.6)</sup> <ref>T. Arai, [https://arxiv.org/abs/1102.0596 A Sneak Preview of Proof Theory of Ordinals] (1997, preprint, p.17). Accessed 7 September 2022.</ref>
<!-- How large is the ordinal theta on page 74 of Hachtman's "Calibrating Determinacy Strength in Borel Hierarchies" (https://escholarship.org/content/qt6tk9351b/qt6tk9351b_noSplash_82b2a392eeaa5314b2f174d8d2ae832b.pdf)?-->
* Least start of third-order gap = least height of model of \( ZFC^- \)+"\( \beth_1 \) exists"<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.6)</sup>
* Least start of third-order gap = least \(\beta\) such that \(L_\beta\) is a model of \( ZFC^- \)+"\( \beth_1 \) exists"<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.6)</sup>
* <!--I would like to put "least start of fourth-order gap" here but my only source is a StackExcahnge answer-->
* <!--I would like to put "least start of fourth-order gap" here but my only source is a StackExchange answer-->
* Least height of model of ZFC<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.6)</sup>
* Least height of model of ZFC<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.6)</sup>
<!--* Least height of a β-model of \(\mathsf{GBC}+\Pi^1_2\mathsf{-CA}\)<ref>K. J. Williams, ''[https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.09526 The Structure of Models of Second-order Set Theories]'' (pp.107--108). PhD dissertation, 2018.</ref><ref>This ordinal is larger than the previous, as the first-order part of any model of \(\mathsf{GBC}+\Pi^1_1\mathsf{-CA}\) contains a model of ZFC in its first-order part (see Williams18 p.8) and this is larger than the ordinal for \(\mathsf{GBC}+\Pi^1_1\mathsf{-CA}\) (see p.108). It is smaller than the next ordinal, as Williams18 axiomatizes GBC using first-order logic, and the least stable ordinal is at least \(\mathrm{sup}\{\mu\alpha.L_\alpha\vDash T\mid T\textrm{ is a recursive first-order set theory}\}\).</ref>-->
* Least stable ordinal<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.6)</sup><ref name="SpectrumOfL">W. Marek, K. Rasmussen, [http://pldml.icm.edu.pl/pldml/element/bwmeta1.element.zamlynska-1afccedc-bd3e-45b8-a2f9-3cbb4c6000bb/c/rm21101.pdf Spectrum of L] </ref><sup>(p.9)</sup>, this is a limit of gap ordinals<ref name="beta2Models">W. Marek, [http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/fm/fm82/fm82112.pdf Stable sets, a characterization of \( \beta_2 \)-models of full second order arithmetic and some related facts] (1974, Fundamenta Mathematicae 82(2), pp.175-189). Accessed 7 September 2022.</ref>
* Least stable ordinal<ref name=":0" /><sup>(p.6)</sup><ref name="SpectrumOfL">W. Marek, K. Rasmussen, [http://pldml.icm.edu.pl/pldml/element/bwmeta1.element.zamlynska-1afccedc-bd3e-45b8-a2f9-3cbb4c6000bb/c/rm21101.pdf Spectrum of L] </ref><sup>(p.9)</sup>, this is a limit of gap ordinals<ref name="beta2Models">W. Marek, [http://matwbn.icm.edu.pl/ksiazki/fm/fm82/fm82112.pdf Stable sets, a characterization of β₂-models of full second order arithmetic and some related facts] (1974, Fundamenta Mathematicae 82(2), pp.175-189). Accessed 7 September 2022.</ref>, this equals the supremum of the \(\Sigma^1_2\)-soundness ordinals of recursively enumerable \(\Sigma^1_2\)-sound extensions of \(\mathrm{ACA}_0\)<ref name="Pi12Consequences" /><sup>p.23</sup>
* Least stable ordinal that's also during a gap - height of least \( \beta_2 \)-model of \( Z_2 \)<ref name="beta2Models />
* Least stable ordinal that's also during a gap - height of least \( \beta_2 \)-model of \( Z_2 \)<ref name="beta2Models" />
* The least non-analytical ordinal. This is the least \( \alpha \) such that \( L_\alpha \prec L_{\omega_1} \).<ref name="SpectrumOfL" /><sup>(p.8)</sup>
* The least non-analytical ordinal. This is the least \( \alpha \) such that \( L_\alpha \prec L_{\omega_1} \).<ref name="SpectrumOfL" /><sup>(p.8)</sup>

The least ordinal \(\alpha\) so that \(\alpha\) is uncountable in \(L\) is equal to the least ordinal which starts a gap of length \(\omega_1\). If \(V = L\), then this is greater than all ordinals on this list and equal to \(\Omega\), while if \(0^\sharp\) exists it is ''significantly'' smaller than \(\omega_1\) and also smaller than the least \(\Pi^1_3\)-reflecting and \(\Sigma^1_3\)-reflecting ordinals<ref>J. P. Aguilera, C. B. Switzer, "[https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.12533v1 Reflection Properties of Ordinals in Generic Extensions]", p.18</ref>, however would still be greater than the least height of a model of KP+"\( \omega_1 \) exists". Also assuming projective determinacy, for \(\alpha<\omega_1^{M_n}\), \(\alpha\) is \(M_n\)-stable iff it is \(\Sigma^1_{n+2}\)-reflecting when \(n\) is even, and \(\Pi^1_{n+2}\)-reflecting when \(n\) is odd, \(M_n\) as in the extender model. <ref>J. P. Aguilera, "[https://www.dropbox.com/s/lrdm0wxscry7ehj/RLPO.pdf?dl=0 Recursively Large Projective Ordinals]", 2022. Accessed 19 January 2024.</ref><sup>Corollary 21</sup> <!--How large are the ordinals \(\sigma_{\Sigma_n,\omega_2}\) and \(\sigma_{\Pi_n,\omega_2}\) here, assuming 0# exists? https://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.12533v1.pdf#page=19-->


== Uncountable ordinals ==
== Uncountable ordinals ==
* [[omega_1|\( \Omega \)]], the smallest [[uncountable_ordinal|uncountable ordinal]]
* [[omega_1|\( \Omega \)]], the smallest [[uncountable]] ordinal
Further on, there lie [[Large cardinal|large cardinals]], so big that their existence is unprovable in ZFC (assuming its consistency), but which are useful if they do exist:
* \( I \), the smallest [[inaccessible_ordinal|inaccessible ordinal]]
* \( M \), the smallest [[mahlo_cardinal|mahlo cardinal]]
* \( I \), the smallest [[inaccessible cardinal]]
* \( K \), the smallest [[weakly_compact_cardinal|weakly compact cardinal]]
* \( M \), the smallest [[Mahlo cardinal]]
* \( K \), the smallest [[weakly compact cardinal]]


== References ==
== References ==

Latest revision as of 04:33, 2 February 2024

Apeirology primarily studies the structure of ordinals. This study can be crudely split into three parts: the recursive ordinals have an explicit (recursive) wellordering describing them; the nonrecursive, countable ordinals, where phenomena such as admissibility and reflection starts to arise; and the uncountable cardinals, particularly large cardinals, where many similarities to the natural numbers disappear and the primary objects being studied include elementary embeddings, cofinality, cardinality and abstract reflection or partition properties.

As such, apeirology is linked to:

  • Set theory (which includes study of large cardinals)
  • α-recursion theory (the study of generalising recursion on the natural numbers to on L_α for admissible ordinals α)
  • β-recursion theory (the generalisation of α-recursion theory to non-admissible α)
  • Proof theory and ordinal analysis (which assigns recursive ordinals to theories according to the lengths of the recursive well-orders they can prove well-founded)
  • Googology (which translates recursive ordinal notations into systems for constructing large finite numbers).

Below we list some milestone ordinals.

Countable ordinals

In this list we assume there is a transitive model of ZFC. The \(\psi\) is Extended Buchholz unless specified.

  • 0, the smallest ordinal
  • 1, the first successor ordinal
  • \( \omega \), the first limit ordinal
  • \( \omega^{2} \), the second infinite additive principal ordinal
  • \( \omega^{3} \)
  • \( \omega^{\omega} \)
  • \( \psi_{0}(\Omega) = \varphi(1,0) = \varepsilon_{0} \), the PTO of PA and ACA0(sort out page)
  • \( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{2}) = \varphi(2,0) = \zeta_{0} \)(decide if own page)
  • \( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{\omega}) = \varphi(\omega,0) \), the second infinite primitive recursively principal ordinal
  • \( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{\Omega}) = \varphi(1,0,0) = \Gamma_{0} \), the Feferman-Schutte ordinal and the PTO of ATR0. This is the least \(\alpha\) such that \(L_\alpha\cap\mathcal P(\omega)\) satisfies Feferman's theory \(\mathrm{IR}\).[1]
  • \( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{\Omega^{2}}) = \varphi(1,0,0,0) \), the Ackermann Ordinal(decide if keep)
  • \( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{\Omega^{\omega}}) = \varphi\begin{pmatrix}1 \\ \omega\end{pmatrix} \), the SVO (Small Veblen ordinal)
  • \( \psi_{0}(\Omega^{\Omega^{\Omega}}) \), the LVO (Large Veblen ordinal)
  • \( \psi_{0}(\Omega_{2}) \), the BHO (Bachmann-Howard ordinal)
  • \( \psi_{0}(\Omega_{\omega}) \), the BO (Buchholz ordinal) and the PTO of \( \Pi^1_1 \)-comprehension
  • \( \psi_{0}(\varepsilon_{\Omega_{\omega} + 1}) \), the TFBO (Takeuti-Feferman-Buchholz ordinal) and the PTO of \( \Pi^1_1 \)-comprehension with bar induction
  • \( \psi_{0}(\Omega_\Omega) \), sometimes known as Bird's ordinal
  • \( \psi_{0}(\Omega_{\Omega_{\dots}}) \), the EBO (Extended Buchholz ordinal) and the PTO of \( \Pi^1_1 \)-transfinite recursion
  • \( \psi_{\Omega}(\varepsilon_{\chi_1(0)+1}) \), the PTO of KPi or \( \Delta^1_2 \)-comprehension with transfinite induction (in Rathjen's Mahlo OCF, also applies to the one below)
  • \( \psi_{\Omega}(\psi_{\chi_{\varepsilon_{M+1}}(0)}(0)) \), the PTO of KPM
  • \( \Psi^{0}_{\Omega}(\varepsilon_{K+1}) \), the PTO of KP+\(\Pi_{3}\)-refl. (in Rathjen's weakly compact OCF)
  • \( \psi_\Omega(\varepsilon_{\mathbb{K}+1}) \), the PTO of KP with a \( \Pi_{\mathbb{N}}\)-refl. universe under ZF + V = L
  • \( \Psi_{\mathbb{X}}^{\varepsilon_{\Upsilon+1}} \) where \( \mathbb{X} = (\omega^+; \textsf{P}_0; \epsilon; \epsilon; 0) \), the limit of Jan-Carl Stegert's second OCF using indescribable cardinals
  • PTO of \( \Pi^1_2 \)-comprehension
  • PTO of \( \text{Z}_{2} \) = PTO of \(\mathrm{ZFC}\) minus powerset
  • PTO of \( \text{KP} + "\omega_1 \) exists \( " \)
  • PTO of \( \text{ZFC} \)
  • \( \omega^{\text{CK}}_{1} \), the Church-Kleene ordinal, i.e. the least ordinal which is not recursive and the second admissible ordinal
  • \( \omega^{\text{CK}}_{\omega} \), the least limit of admissible ordinals = the least \(\alpha\) such that \(L_\alpha\cap\mathcal P(\omega)\) models \( \Pi^1_1 \)-comprehension = \(\Sigma^1_2\)-soundness ordinal of \(\Pi^1_1\mathrm{-CA}_0\)[2]p.24
  • The least recursively inaccessible ordinal = the least \(\alpha\) such that \(L_\alpha\) models \( \textsf{KPi} \) or \(L_\alpha\cap\mathcal P(\omega)\) models \( \Delta^1_2 \)-comprehension[3](p.3)
  • The least recursively Mahlo ordinal = the least doubly \( \Pi_2 \)-reflecting ordinal = the least \(\alpha\) such that \(L_\alpha\) models \( \textsf{KPM} \)[3](p.3)
  • The least recursively hyper-Mahlo ordinal[4](p.13)
  • The least \( \Pi_n \)-reflecting ordinals, for \( 2<n<\omega \)[4]
  • The least \( (+1) \)-stable ordinal[3](p.4)
  • The least \( (+\alpha) \)-stable ordinal, for small \(\alpha\)
  • The least \( (\cdot 2) \)-stable ordinal
  • The least \( (^+) \)-stable ordinal = the least \( \Pi^1_1 \)-reflecting ordinal[3](p.4)
  • The least ordinal that is \( \Pi^1_1 \)-reflecting on the \( \Pi^1_1 \)-reflecting ordinals[5]
  • The least \( \Sigma^1_1 \)-reflecting ordinal = the least non-Gandy ordinal[5](pp.3,9)[3]
  • The \( (\sigma^1_1)^n \)-reflecting ordinals for \( 1<n<\omega \)[5](p.20)
  • The least \( (^++1) \)-stable ordinal[5]Each class of \((\sigma^1_1)^n\)-rfl. ordinals is nonempty below this ordinal (p.20)
  • The least (next recursively inaccessible ordinal)-stable ordinal
  • The least (next recursively Mahlo ordinal)-stable ordinal
  • The least (next \( \Pi_n \)-reflecting ordinal)-stable ordinal, for \( 2<n<\omega \)
  • The least doubly \( (+1) \)-stable ordinal[3](p.4)
  • The least \(\omega\)-ply stable ordinal = the least ordinal stable up to a nonprojectible ordinal = \(\Sigma^1_2\)-soundness ordinal of \(\Pi^1_2\mathrm{-CA}_0\)[2]p.24
  • The least nonprojectible ordinal[3](p.5) = the least ordinal \( \Pi_2 \)-reflecting on the ordinals stable up to it = the least limit of \(\omega\)-ply stable ordinals[6](p.218)
  • The least \( \Sigma_2 \)-admissible ordinal[3](pp.5-6) = least ordinal \( \Pi_3 \)-reflecting on the ordinals stable up to it[6](p.221)
  • HIGHER STABILITY STUFF GOES HERE(sort out)
  • Some Welch stuff here
  • Infinite time Turing machine ordinals
    • \( \lambda \), the supremum of all writable ordinals = the least ordinal stable up to \( \zeta \) ordinal
    • \( \gamma \), the supremum of all clockable ordinals, equal to \( \lambda \)
    • \( \zeta \), the supremum of all eventually writable ordinals = the least \( \Sigma_2 \)-extendible ordinal
    • \( \Sigma \), the supremum of all accidentally writable ordinals = the least target of \( \Sigma_2 \)-stability
  • The least ordinal in \(E_1\),[7] in unpublished work Welch has shown this is an ordinal referred to as \(\zeta^{\varnothing^{\blacktriangledown}}\)[8]
  • The least ordinal in \(E_\eta\), for \(\eta > 1\)[7]
  • The least admissible \(\alpha\) so that \(L_\alpha\) satisfies \(\mathsf{AQI}\), arithmetical quasi-induction = the least admissible \(\alpha\) so that, for all \(x \in \mathcal{P}(\omega) \cap L_\alpha\), there are \(\xi, \sigma < \alpha\) so that \(L_\xi[x] \prec_{\Sigma_2} L_\sigma[x]\)[7]Template:Verification failed
  • Least \(\beta\) where \(L_\beta\) starts a chain of \(\Sigma_3\)-elementary substructures [7]
  • The smallest gap ordinal[9] = the least simultaneously \(\Sigma_n\)-nonprojectible ordinal for all \(n<\omega\)[10]
  • Least start of a gap in the constructible universe of length 2[9]
  • Least \( \beta \) that starts a gap of length \( \beta \)[9]
  • Least \( \beta \) that starts gap of length \( \beta^\beta \)[9]
  • Least \( \beta \) that starts gap of length \( \beta^+ \) - \(L_{\beta^+}\) here is a model of KP+"\( \omega_1 \) exists".[3](p.6) [11]
  • Least start of third-order gap = least \(\beta\) such that \(L_\beta\) is a model of \( ZFC^- \)+"\( \beth_1 \) exists"[3](p.6)
  • Least height of model of ZFC[3](p.6)
  • Least stable ordinal[3](p.6)[12](p.9), this is a limit of gap ordinals[13], this equals the supremum of the \(\Sigma^1_2\)-soundness ordinals of recursively enumerable \(\Sigma^1_2\)-sound extensions of \(\mathrm{ACA}_0\)[2]p.23
  • Least stable ordinal that's also during a gap - height of least \( \beta_2 \)-model of \( Z_2 \)[13]
  • The least non-analytical ordinal. This is the least \( \alpha \) such that \( L_\alpha \prec L_{\omega_1} \).[12](p.8)

The least ordinal \(\alpha\) so that \(\alpha\) is uncountable in \(L\) is equal to the least ordinal which starts a gap of length \(\omega_1\). If \(V = L\), then this is greater than all ordinals on this list and equal to \(\Omega\), while if \(0^\sharp\) exists it is significantly smaller than \(\omega_1\) and also smaller than the least \(\Pi^1_3\)-reflecting and \(\Sigma^1_3\)-reflecting ordinals[14], however would still be greater than the least height of a model of KP+"\( \omega_1 \) exists". Also assuming projective determinacy, for \(\alpha<\omega_1^{M_n}\), \(\alpha\) is \(M_n\)-stable iff it is \(\Sigma^1_{n+2}\)-reflecting when \(n\) is even, and \(\Pi^1_{n+2}\)-reflecting when \(n\) is odd, \(M_n\) as in the extender model. [15]Corollary 21

Uncountable ordinals

Further on, there lie large cardinals, so big that their existence is unprovable in ZFC (assuming its consistency), but which are useful if they do exist:

References

  1. S. G. Simpson, "Predicativity: The Outer Limits" (2000), p.3. Accessed 30 January 2024.
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 J. P. Aguilera, F. Pakhomov, "The Π12 Consequences of a Theory" (2021). Accessed 18 January 2024.
  3. 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 3.11 D. Madore, A Zoo of Ordinals (2017). Accessed 7 September 2022.
  4. 4.0 4.1 W. Richter, P. Aczel, [https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/44063 Inductive Definitions and Reflecting Properties of Admissible Ordinals] (1973, preprint, Universitetet i Oslo). Accessed 7 September 2022.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 J. P. Aguilera, The Order of Reflection (2019, arxiv preprint). Accessed 7 September 2022.
  6. 6.0 6.1 E. Kranakis, [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003484382900225 Reflection and Partition Properties of Admissible Ordinals] (1980). Accessed 7 September 2022.
  7. 7.0 7.1 7.2 7.3 P. D. Welch, Weak Systems of Determinacy and Arithmetical Quasi-Inductive Definitions (April 2010 draft). Accessed 11 January 2023.
  8. R. S. Lubarsky, "ITTMs with Feedback", in Ways of Proof Theory, edited by R. Schindler, Ontos Series in Mathematical Logic (2010, p.338).
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 W. Marek, M. Srebrny, Gaps in the Constructible Universe (1973). Accessed 7 September 2022.
  10. The Higher Infinite in Proof Theory, Michael Rathjen
  11. T. Arai, A Sneak Preview of Proof Theory of Ordinals (1997, preprint, p.17). Accessed 7 September 2022.
  12. 12.0 12.1 W. Marek, K. Rasmussen, Spectrum of L
  13. 13.0 13.1 W. Marek, Stable sets, a characterization of β₂-models of full second order arithmetic and some related facts (1974, Fundamenta Mathematicae 82(2), pp.175-189). Accessed 7 September 2022.
  14. J. P. Aguilera, C. B. Switzer, "Reflection Properties of Ordinals in Generic Extensions", p.18
  15. J. P. Aguilera, "Recursively Large Projective Ordinals", 2022. Accessed 19 January 2024.