Gandy ordinal: Difference between revisions

14 bytes removed ,  10 months ago
"Diagonalizer" terminology not needed, Taranovsky has given this as an example of an ordinal assignment in DoR
No edit summary
("Diagonalizer" terminology not needed, Taranovsky has given this as an example of an ordinal assignment in DoR)
Line 1:
For an ordinal \(\alpha\), let \(\delta(\alpha)\) be the supremum of the order-types of \(\alpha\)-recursive well-orderings on a subset of \(\alpha\). An [[ordinal]] \(\alpha\) is called Gandy if \(\delta(\alpha)\) is equal to the next [[admissible]] ordinal after \(\alpha\), i.e. \(\delta(\alpha) = \alpha^+\). For example, \(\omega\) is trivially Gandy, and in general, any ordinal below the least recursively inaccessible ordinal is Gandy. An ordinal which is not Gandy is called non-Gandy or, colloquially, bad. The least bad ordinal is equal to the least ordinal which is \(\Sigma^1_1\)-reflecting<ref>R. Gostanian. The Next Admissible Ordinal. Ann. Math. Logic, 17:171–203, 1979</ref>, which is greater than the least \(\alpha\) which is \(\alpha^+\)-stable, and less than the least \(\alpha\) which is \(\alpha^++1\)-stable.<ref>The Order of Reflection, J. P. Aguilera</ref> The structure of stability at the level of bad ordinals and beyond becomes a lot more complex, due to the highly nonlinear nature of iterated \(\Sigma^1_1\)- and \(\Pi^1_1\)-reflection, and one needing more and more iterations of \(\delta\) to reach the next admissible ordinal.
 
Proper usage of previously ignored, intricate bad ordinal structure is believed to be essential to maximising the strength of ordinal collapsing functions and associated ordinal notations. For example, it is believed that the least bad ordinal mayis bea usefulsuitable ordinal to actassign asto a "diagonalizer" in athe possibleterm formalization\(\Omega\) in Dmytro Taranovsky's "Degrees of Reflection".
160

edits