Fodor's lemma: Difference between revisions

From Apeirology Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:


==Importance to apierology==
==Importance to apierology==
Since \(\omega_1\) is regular, setting \(S=\{<\omega_1\}\), Fodor's lemma implies there does not exist a fundamental sequence system that both assigns a sequence to all countable ordinals, and has the Bachmann property. Fodor's lemma may fail without choice<nowiki><ref>A. Karagila, </nowiki>[https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.03985 Fodor's Lemma can Fail Everywhere]<nowiki></ref></nowiki>, but instead we can use a weakened version known as '''Neumer's theorem''' to prove this result, in which the set \(S\) is removed and replaced with \(\{<\kappa\}\) in all cases.
Since \(\omega_1\) is regular, setting \(S=\{<\omega_1\}\), Fodor's lemma implies there does not exist a fundamental sequence system that both assigns a sequence to all countable ordinals, and has the Bachmann property. Fodor's lemma may fail without choice<ref>A. Karagila, [https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.03985 Fodor's Lemma can Fail Everywhere]</ref>, but instead we can use a weakened version known as '''Neumer's theorem''' to prove this result, in which the set \(S\) is removed and replaced with \(\{<\kappa\}\) in all cases.
==References==
==References==
* E. Tachtsis, [https://www.ams.org/journals/proc/2020-148-03/S0002-9939-2019-14794-8/S0002-9939-2019-14794-8.pdf Juh&aacute;sz's topological generalization of Neumer's theorem may fail in ZF] (2019). Corollary 2.7.
* E. Tachtsis, [https://www.ams.org/journals/proc/2020-148-03/S0002-9939-2019-14794-8/S0002-9939-2019-14794-8.pdf Juh&aacute;sz's topological generalization of Neumer's theorem may fail in ZF] (2019). Corollary 2.7.
* Karel Hrbacek & Thomas Jech, Introduction to Set Theory, 3rd edition, Chapter 11, Section 3.
* Karel Hrbacek & Thomas Jech, Introduction to Set Theory, 3rd edition, Chapter 11, Section 3.
<references />
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 21:26, 29 August 2023

Fodor's lemma (or the pressing-down lemma) is a lemma proven by Géza Fodor in 1956. The lemma states that when \(\kappa\) is an uncountable regular cardinal and \(S\) is a stationary set of ordinals \(<\kappa\), any regressive function \(f:S\to\{<\kappa\}\) must be constant on a stationary set of ordinals \(<\kappa\).

Importance to apierology[edit | edit source]

Since \(\omega_1\) is regular, setting \(S=\{<\omega_1\}\), Fodor's lemma implies there does not exist a fundamental sequence system that both assigns a sequence to all countable ordinals, and has the Bachmann property. Fodor's lemma may fail without choice[1], but instead we can use a weakened version known as Neumer's theorem to prove this result, in which the set \(S\) is removed and replaced with \(\{<\kappa\}\) in all cases.

References[edit | edit source]