Correct cardinal: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
CreeperBomb (talk | contribs) (Undo revision 684 by Cobsonwabag (talk)) Tag: Undo |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A \(\Sigma_n\)-correct cardinal is a cardinal \(\kappa\) such that \(V_\kappa\) is a \(\Sigma_n\)-elementary substructure of \(V\), where \(\Sigma_n\) is from the Lévy hierarchy.{{citation needed}} |
A \(\Sigma_n\)-correct cardinal is a cardinal \(\kappa\) such that \(V_\kappa\) is a \(\Sigma_n\)-elementary substructure of \(V\), where \(\Sigma_n\) is from the Lévy hierarchy.{{citation needed}} |
||
A regular cardinal is \(\Sigma_2\)-correct iff for every first-order formula \(\phi(x)\) and any \(x\in H_\kappa\), if \(\exists\alpha(H_\alpha\vDash\phi(x))\), then there is a \(\beta<\kappa\) such that \(H_\beta\vDash\phi(x)\). <ref>[https://logicdavid.github.io/files/mthesis.pdf#page=21]</ref> |
A regular cardinal \(\kappa\) is \(\Sigma_2\)-correct iff for every first-order formula \(\phi(x)\) and any \(x\in H_\kappa\), if \(\exists\alpha(H_\alpha\vDash\phi(x))\), then there is a \(\beta<\kappa\) such that \(H_\beta\vDash\phi(x)\). <ref>[https://logicdavid.github.io/files/mthesis.pdf#page=21]</ref> |
Latest revision as of 16:50, 25 March 2024
A \(\Sigma_n\)-correct cardinal is a cardinal \(\kappa\) such that \(V_\kappa\) is a \(\Sigma_n\)-elementary substructure of \(V\), where \(\Sigma_n\) is from the Lévy hierarchy.[Citation needed]
A regular cardinal \(\kappa\) is \(\Sigma_2\)-correct iff for every first-order formula \(\phi(x)\) and any \(x\in H_\kappa\), if \(\exists\alpha(H_\alpha\vDash\phi(x))\), then there is a \(\beta<\kappa\) such that \(H_\beta\vDash\phi(x)\). [1]