Burali–Forti paradox: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(Created page with "The '''Burali–Forti paradox''' refers to the theorem that there is no set containing all von Neumann ordinals. Essentially, if there were such a set, then it would itself be a von Neumann ordinal, contradicting well-foundedness (or more directly the axiom of regularity).")
 
No edit summary
Line 1:
The '''Burali–Forti paradox''' refers to the theorem that there is no set containing all [[von Neumann ordinal]]s. Essentially, if there were such a set, then it would itself be a von Neumann ordinal, contradicting [[wellthe axiom of foundation, which implies no set can be an element of itself. In second-foundedness]]order (ortheories moresuch directlyas Morse-Kelley set theory, this issue is circumvented by making the [[axiomcollection of regularity]]ordinals a proper class, while all ordinals are sets (and proper classes can not contain other proper classes).